| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
{| style="width: 97%" border="0" cellpadding="20" cellspacing="1" | {| style="width: 97%" border="0" cellpadding="20" cellspacing="1" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | style="width: | + | | style="width: 32%" valign="top" | <div class="span4"> |
<span style="font-size:large">'''<span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">Important dates</span>'''</span> | <span style="font-size:large">'''<span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">Important dates</span>'''</span> | ||
*Paper decision: '''9 Nov 2015''' | *Paper decision: '''9 Nov 2015''' | ||
| − | *Artifact submission: ''' | + | *Artifact submission: '''20 Nov 2015 AoE''' |
*Technical clarification: '''14-20 Dec 2015''' | *Technical clarification: '''14-20 Dec 2015''' | ||
*Decision announced: '''22 Dec 2015''' | *Decision announced: '''22 Dec 2015''' | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
The review process is described in detail [http://www.artifact-eval.org/review-process.html here]. We are preparing a revised version. | The review process is described in detail [http://www.artifact-eval.org/review-process.html here]. We are preparing a revised version. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| − | | style="width: | + | | style="width: 33%" valign="top" | |
<span style="font-size:large">'''<span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">Artifact Evaluation Committee (AEC)</span>'''</span> | <span style="font-size:large">'''<span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">Artifact Evaluation Committee (AEC)</span>'''</span> | ||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
Artifacts have been already evaluated at several other conferences and workshops including recent [http://cTuning.org/event/ae-cgo2015 CGO 2015], [http://pldi14-aec.cs.brown.edu PLDI 2014], [http://2014.splashcon.org/track/splash2014-artifacts OOPSLA 2014] and [http://adapt-workshop.org/2014 ADAPT 2014]. Our eventual goal is to develop common evaluation methodology gradually and collaboratively. | Artifacts have been already evaluated at several other conferences and workshops including recent [http://cTuning.org/event/ae-cgo2015 CGO 2015], [http://pldi14-aec.cs.brown.edu PLDI 2014], [http://2014.splashcon.org/track/splash2014-artifacts OOPSLA 2014] and [http://adapt-workshop.org/2014 ADAPT 2014]. Our eventual goal is to develop common evaluation methodology gradually and collaboratively. | ||
| − | | style="width: | + | | style="width: 32%" valign="top" | |
<span style="font-size:large">'''<span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">Discussions</span>'''</span> | <span style="font-size:large">'''<span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">Discussions</span>'''</span> | ||
Revision as of 02:34, 21 April 2015
 |
Artifact Evaluation for PPoPP'16 |
| Important dates
Packaging guidelines AE for CGO/PPoPP'15 used the following guidelines for artifacts . We are preparing a revised version. How to submit Please read the guidelines on what to submit. Please upload your submission to EasyChair (join CGO/PPoPP submission). Review process The review process is described in detail here. We are preparing a revised version. |
Artifact Evaluation Committee (AEC) Chairs:
Committee (joint with CGO'16):
Prior Artifact Evaluation Last year, PPoPP 2015 successfully ran artifact evaluation process for the first time. PPoPP 2016 continues this experiment. Artifacts have been already evaluated at several other conferences and workshops including recent CGO 2015, PLDI 2014, OOPSLA 2014 and ADAPT 2014. Our eventual goal is to develop common evaluation methodology gradually and collaboratively. |
Discussions We consider AE as a continuous learning curve. If you have questions or comments and suggestions on how to improve packaging and reviewing process, please get in touch! Our presenation about Artifact Evaluation Experience at CGO/PPoPP'15 is available online here. |
