| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| <p style="text-align: center"><span style="font-size:xx-large">'''<span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">Artifact Evaluation for PPoPP'15</span>'''</span></p><p style="text-align: center"><span style="font-size:small">[ [http://ppopp15.soe.ucsc.edu Back to PPoPP'15 conference website] ]</span></p> | | <p style="text-align: center"><span style="font-size:xx-large">'''<span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">Artifact Evaluation for PPoPP'15</span>'''</span></p><p style="text-align: center"><span style="font-size:small">[ [http://ppopp15.soe.ucsc.edu Back to PPoPP'15 conference website] ]</span></p> | ||
|} | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| Line 86: | Line 88: | ||
*'''''More than You Ever Wanted to Know about Synchronization'''''<br/>Vincent Gramoli | *'''''More than You Ever Wanted to Know about Synchronization'''''<br/>Vincent Gramoli | ||
*'''''Cache-Oblivious Wavefront: Improving Parallelism of Recursive DP Algorithms without Losing Cache-efficiency'''''<br/>Yuan Tang, Ronghui You, Haibin Kan, Jesmin Tithi, Pramod Ganapathi and Rezaul Chowdhury | *'''''Cache-Oblivious Wavefront: Improving Parallelism of Recursive DP Algorithms without Losing Cache-efficiency'''''<br/>Yuan Tang, Ronghui You, Haibin Kan, Jesmin Tithi, Pramod Ganapathi and Rezaul Chowdhury | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
<span style="font-size:large">'''<span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">Discussions</span>'''</span> | <span style="font-size:large">'''<span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">Discussions</span>'''</span> | ||
Revision as of 19:37, 12 February 2015
 |
Artifact Evaluation for PPoPP'15 |
| Important dates
Packaging guidelines We use the following guidelines for artifacts. Because we want to encourage as many of you as possible to submit, these are only guidelines, not hard rules. Of course, if the material you want us to evaluate is fairly standard, following these suggestions will greatly simplify our lives. After all, remember: You want us to be able to evaluate your artifact, don't you? How to submit Please read the guidelines on what to submit. Please upload your submission to EasyChair (common with CGO). Review process The review process is described in detail here. Prior Artifact Evaluation Artifacts have been already evaluated at several conferences and workshops including recent PLDI 2014, OOPSLA 2014 and ADAPT 2014. Our eventual goal is to develop the common evaluation methodology gradually and collaboratively. See artifact-eval.org and c-mind.org/reproducibility for more details. |
Artifact Evaluation Committee (AEC) Chairs:
Advisory board:
Committee members:
|
Above threshold List of papers with artifacts above threshold:
Discussions We consider AE as a continuous learning curve. If you have questions or comments and suggestions on how to improve packaging and reviewing process, please get in touch or use our public Google or LinkedIn groups. We will hold a joint public CGO/PPoPP AE discussion session on February 9th, 2015. |
Sponsors and supporters
