From cTuning.org
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''''Assorted questions for the panel:''''' | '''''Assorted questions for the panel:''''' | ||
| - | * ''Albert Cohen, INRIA'' | + | * ''Albert Cohen, INRIA'': I'd love to raise the issue about learning curve and development productivity with GCC code base. |
| - | I'd love to raise the issue about learning curve and development productivity with GCC code base. | + | |
| - | * ''Grigori Fursin, INRIA'' | + | * ''Grigori Fursin, INRIA'': I would like to discuss further extensions to ICI needed to provide compiler/architecture/language independent API for program analysis and optimization (unified data exchange format?) that may be needed for our further research on "reactive iterative compilation" |
| - | I would like to discuss further extensions to ICI needed to provide | + | |
| - | compiler/architecture/language independent API for program analysis and optimization | + | |
| - | (unified data exchange format?) that may be needed for our further research on "reactive iterative compilation" | + | |
and split-compilation... | and split-compilation... | ||
Revision as of 06:17, 22 January 2010
Assorted questions for the panel:
- Albert Cohen, INRIA: I'd love to raise the issue about learning curve and development productivity with GCC code base.
- Grigori Fursin, INRIA: I would like to discuss further extensions to ICI needed to provide compiler/architecture/language independent API for program analysis and optimization (unified data exchange format?) that may be needed for our further research on "reactive iterative compilation"
and split-compilation...