| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
** http://www.library.manchester.ac.uk/services-and-support/staff/research/services/research-data-management/policy | ** http://www.library.manchester.ac.uk/services-and-support/staff/research/services/research-data-management/policy | ||
** http://www.library.manchester.ac.uk/services-and-support/staff/research/services/research-data-management/data-management-planning | ** http://www.library.manchester.ac.uk/services-and-support/staff/research/services/research-data-management/data-management-planning | ||
| + | * Cornell University, USA: [http://data.research.cornell.edu/content/best-practices Best Practices] | ||
Revision as of 07:54, 24 September 2015
Assorted articles and presentations
- Our experience report with encountered problems in computer systems' research and new proposal for community-driven reviewing and validation of publications [arXiv , ACM DL]
- Science's Reproducibility Problem, Bob Grant, The Scientist
- From Repeatability to Reproducibility and Corroboration, Dror G. Feitelson, SIGOPS Operating Syst. Rev. 49(1), pp. 3-11, Jan 2015
- Reviewing peer review, Jeannette M. Wing, ACM Blog
- How Should Peer Review Evolve?, Ed H. Chi, ACM Blog
- Cambridge University news about open and reproducible research
- Interesting Replicable "Badge" for journal articles, Daniel S. Katz
- Research Wranglers: Initiatives to Improve Reproducibility of Study Findings (Environmental Health Perspectives)
- Reproducible Research in Computational Science: Problems and Solutions For Data and Code Sharing, Victoria Stodden, ICML workshop 2010
- Predatory publishing
- Three myths about scientific peer review
- The repeatability experiment of SIGMOD 2008, SIGMOD Record, vol. 37, no. 1 (March 2008), 39-45.
- "Begin with an Author's response to Reviews" - proposal to submit past reviews along with articles
- Presentation by Professor Carole Goble
- Dennis McCafferty, "Should Code be Released?"
- Elsevier:Can data be peer-reviewed?
- Elsevier:The Executable Paper Grand Challenge
- Special section on Data replication & reproducibility, Science magazine, 2 December 2011
- Chris Drummond, "Replicability is not Reproducibility: Nor is it Good Science"
- Science is in a reproducibility crisis - how do we resolve it?
- W3C Dataset Descriptions: HCLS Community Profile
- My blog article on "Automatic performance tuning and reproducibility as a side effect" for the Software Sustainability Institute
- Trouble at the Lab, The Economist, 2013
- Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles
- Puzzling Measurement of "Big G" Gravitational Constant Ignites Debate
- International vocabulary of metrology – Basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM)
- White House takes notice of reproducibility in science, and wants your opinion
- Problems during performance benchmarking:
- [https://homes.cs.washington.edu/~bornholt/post/performance-evaluation.html]
We also experienced many similar issues during our work on auto-tuning and machine learning: - [http://hal.inria.fr/hal-01054763]
- [http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.4020]
- [https://homes.cs.washington.edu/~bornholt/post/performance-evaluation.html]
- ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review - Special Issue on Repeatability and Sharing of Experimental Artifacts
- Vinton G. Cerf. "Bit Rot: Long-Term Preservation of Digital Information" [Point of View]
- About citations: less related though interesting
Journals with artifact sharing and evaluation
National requirements
- UK EPSRC expectations on research data management
- University of Manchester, UK:
- Cornell University, USA: Best Practices
