| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
The review process is described in detail [http://www.artifact-eval.org/review-process.html here]. | The review process is described in detail [http://www.artifact-eval.org/review-process.html here]. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
| style="width: 35%" valign="top" | | | style="width: 35%" valign="top" | | ||
| Line 91: | Line 87: | ||
We consider AE as a continuous learning curve. If you have questions or comments and suggestions on how to improve packaging and reviewing process, please get in touch or use our public [https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/collective-mind Google] or [http://www.linkedin.com/groups/Reproducible-research-experimentation-in-computer-7433414 LinkedIn] groups. We will hold a joint public CGO/PPoPP AE discussion session on February 9th, 2015. | We consider AE as a continuous learning curve. If you have questions or comments and suggestions on how to improve packaging and reviewing process, please get in touch or use our public [https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/collective-mind Google] or [http://www.linkedin.com/groups/Reproducible-research-experimentation-in-computer-7433414 LinkedIn] groups. We will hold a joint public CGO/PPoPP AE discussion session on February 9th, 2015. | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | colspan="3" style="width: 25%" valign="top" | | ||
| + | <span style="font-size:large">'''<span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">Prior Artifact Evaluation</span>'''</span> | ||
| + | Artifacts have been already evaluated at several conferences and workshops including recent [http://pldi14-aec.cs.brown.edu PLDI 2014], [http://2014.splashcon.org/track/splash2014-artifacts OOPSLA 2014] and [http://adapt-workshop.org/2014 ADAPT 2014]. Our eventual goal is to develop common evaluation methodology gradually and collaboratively. See [http://artifact-eval.org artifact-eval.org] and [http://cknowledge.org/reproducibility cknowledge.org/reproducibility] for more details. | ||
|} | |} | ||
| Line 99: | Line 99: | ||
<br/>'''Sponsors and supporters''' | <br/>'''Sponsors and supporters''' | ||
| − | [[File:NVLogo 2D resize.jpg|link=http://nvidia.com]][[File:CTuning foundation logo1a.png|link=http://cTuning.org]] | + | [[File:NVLogo 2D resize.jpg|NVLogo 2D resize.jpg|link=http://nvidia.com]][[File:CTuning foundation logo1a.png|CTuning foundation logo1a.png|link=http://cTuning.org]] |
</center> | </center> | ||
Revision as of 16:29, 8 February 2015
 |
Artifact Evaluation for CGO'15 |
| Important dates
Packaging guidelines We use the following guidelines for artifacts. Because we want to encourage as many of you as possible to submit, these are only guidelines, not hard rules. Of course, if the material you want us to evaluate is fairly standard, following these suggestions will greatly simplify our lives. After all, remember: You want us to be able to evaluate your artifact, don't you? How to submit Please read the guidelines on what to submit. Please upload your submission to EasyChair (common with PPoPP). Review process The review process is described in detail here. |
Artifact Evaluation Committee (AEC) Chairs:
Advisory board:
Committee members:
|
Above threshold List of papers with artifacts above threshold:
Prize Nvidia and cTuning foundation will provide prizes for highest ranked artifacts from CGO and PPoPP (will be announced at the conference). Discussions We consider AE as a continuous learning curve. If you have questions or comments and suggestions on how to improve packaging and reviewing process, please get in touch or use our public Google or LinkedIn groups. We will hold a joint public CGO/PPoPP AE discussion session on February 9th, 2015. |
|
Prior Artifact Evaluation Artifacts have been already evaluated at several conferences and workshops including recent PLDI 2014, OOPSLA 2014 and ADAPT 2014. Our eventual goal is to develop common evaluation methodology gradually and collaboratively. See artifact-eval.org and cknowledge.org/reproducibility for more details. | ||
Sponsors and supporters
