Revision as of 12:04, 5 February 2015

[ Back to main page ]

Assorted articles and presentations

• Our Experience report and new proposal: community-driven reviewing and validation of publications [arXiv , ACM DL]
• Research Wranglers: Initiatives to Improve Reproducibility of Study Findings (Environmental Health Perspectives)
• Predatory publishing
• Three myths about scientific peer review
• "Begin with an Author's response to Reviews" - proposal to submit past reviews along with articles
• Presentation by Professor Carole Goble
• Dennis McCafferty, "Should Code be Released?"
• Chris Drummond, "Replicability is not Reproducibility: Nor is it Good Science"
• Science is in a reproducibility crisis - how do we resolve it?
• My blog article on "Automatic performance tuning and reproducibility as a side effect"  for the Software Sustainability Institute
• Puzzling Measurement of "Big G" Gravitational Constant Ignites Debate
• White House takes notice of reproducibility in science, and wants your opinion
• Problems during performance benchmarking:
  • [https://homes.cs.washington.edu/~bornholt/post/performance-evaluation.html]
    We also experienced many similar issues during our work on auto-tuning and machine learning:
  • [http://hal.inria.fr/hal-01054763]
  • [http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.4020]
• ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review - Special Issue on Repeatability and Sharing of Experimental Artifacts
• Vinton G. Cerf. "Bit Rot: Long-Term Preservation of Digital Information" [Point of View]
• About citations: less related though interesting

Journals with artifact evaluation:

•  IPOL Journal: Image Processing On Line