| Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
<span style="font-size:large">'''<span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">Above threshold</span>'''</span> | <span style="font-size:large">'''<span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">Above threshold</span>'''</span> | ||
| − | + | List of papers with artifacts above threshold: | |
| − | *'''''NUMA-aware Graph-structured Analytics'''''<br/>Hee-Seok Kim, Izzat El Hajj, John Stratton, Steven Lumetta and Wen-Mei Hwu | + | *'''''NUMA-aware Graph-structured Analytics'''''<br/>Hee-Seok Kim, Izzat El Hajj, John Stratton, Steven Lumetta and Wen-Mei Hwu |
| − | *<span>'''''MemorySanitizer: fast detector of uninitialized memory use in C++'''''<br/>Evgeniy Stepanov and Konstantin Serebryany</span | + | *<span>'''''MemorySanitizer: fast detector of uninitialized memory use in C++'''''<br/>Evgeniy Stepanov and Konstantin Serebryany</span> |
| − | *'''''A Parallel Abstract Interpreter for JavaScript'''''<br/>Kyle Dewey, Vineeth Kashyap and Ben Hardekopf | + | *'''''A Parallel Abstract Interpreter for JavaScript'''''<br/>Kyle Dewey, Vineeth Kashyap and Ben Hardekopf |
| − | *'''''A Graph-Based Higher-Order Intermediate Representation'''''<br/>Roland Leißa, Marcel Köster and Sebastian Hack | + | *'''''A Graph-Based Higher-Order Intermediate Representation'''''<br/>Roland Leißa, Marcel Köster and Sebastian Hack |
| − | *'''''Optimizing the flash-RAM energy trade-off in deeply embedded systems'''''<br/>James Pallister, Kerstin Eder and Simon J. Hollis | + | *'''''Optimizing the flash-RAM energy trade-off in deeply embedded systems'''''<br/>James Pallister, Kerstin Eder and Simon J. Hollis |
*'''''Scalable Conditional Induction Variable (CIV) Analysis'''''<br/>Cosmin E. Oancea and Lawrence Rauchwerger | *'''''Scalable Conditional Induction Variable (CIV) Analysis'''''<br/>Cosmin E. Oancea and Lawrence Rauchwerger | ||
<p style="text-align: center"></p><p style="text-align: center">'''[http://cTuning.org cTuning foundation] provided a prize of ~500$ for a distinguished artifact from CGO or PPoPP (will be announced at the conference).'''</p> | <p style="text-align: center"></p><p style="text-align: center">'''[http://cTuning.org cTuning foundation] provided a prize of ~500$ for a distinguished artifact from CGO or PPoPP (will be announced at the conference).'''</p> | ||
Revision as of 14:34, 16 December 2014
 |
Artifact Evaluation for CGO'15 |
| Important dates
Packaging guidelines We use the following guidelines for artifacts. Because we want to encourage as many of you as possible to submit, these are only guidelines, not hard rules. Of course, if the material you want us to evaluate is fairly standard, following these suggestions will greatly simplify our lives. After all, remember: You want us to be able to evaluate your artifact, don't you? How to submit Please read the guidelines on what to submit. Please upload your submission to EasyChair (common with PPoPP). Review process The review process is described in detail here. Prior Artifact Evaluation Artifacts have been already evaluated at several conferences and workshops including recent PLDI 2014, OOPSLA 2014 and ADAPT 2014. Our eventual goal is to develop the common evaluation methodology gradually and collaboratively. See artifact-eval.org and c-mind.org/reproducibility for more details. |
Artifact Evaluation Committee (AEC) Chairs:
Advisory board:
Committee members:
Committee members:
|
Above threshold List of papers with artifacts above threshold:
cTuning foundation provided a prize of ~500$ for a distinguished artifact from CGO or PPoPP (will be announced at the conference). Discussions We consider AE as a continuous learning curve. If you have questions or comments and suggestions on how to improve packaging and reviewing process, please get in touch or use our public Google or LinkedIn groups. We will hold a joint public CGO/PPoPP AE discussion session on December 9th, 2015.
|
Sponsors and supporters
