| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
{| style="width: 97%" border="0" cellpadding="20" cellspacing="1" | {| style="width: 97%" border="0" cellpadding="20" cellspacing="1" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | style="width: | + | | style="width: 25%" valign="top" | <div class="span4"> |
<span style="font-size:large">'''<span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">Important dates</span>'''</span> | <span style="font-size:large">'''<span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">Important dates</span>'''</span> | ||
| − | *CGO paper decision: <strike>'''10 Nov 2014'''</strike> | + | *CGO paper decision:<br/><strike>'''10 Nov 2014'''</strike> |
| − | *Artifact submission: <strike>'''18 Nov 2014 AoE'''</strike> | + | *Artifact submission:<br/><strike>'''18 Nov 2014 AoE'''</strike> |
| − | *Technical clarification: <strike>'''10-12 Dec 2014'''</strike> | + | *Technical clarification:<br/><strike>'''10-12 Dec 2014'''</strike> |
| − | *Decision announced: '''16 Dec 2014''' | + | *Decision announced:<br/><strike>'''16 Dec 2014'''</strike> |
| − | *Public discussion: '''9 Feb 2015''' | + | *Public discussion:<br/>'''9 Feb 2015''' |
<span style="font-size:large">'''<span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">Packaging guidelines</span>'''</span> | <span style="font-size:large">'''<span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">Packaging guidelines</span>'''</span> | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
Artifacts have been already evaluated at several conferences and workshops including recent [http://pldi14-aec.cs.brown.edu PLDI 2014], [http://2014.splashcon.org/track/splash2014-artifacts OOPSLA 2014] and [http://adapt-workshop.org/2014 ADAPT 2014]. Our eventual goal is to develop the common evaluation methodology gradually and collaboratively. See [http://artifact-eval.org artifact-eval.org] and [http://c-mind.org/reproducibility c-mind.org/reproducibility] for more details. | Artifacts have been already evaluated at several conferences and workshops including recent [http://pldi14-aec.cs.brown.edu PLDI 2014], [http://2014.splashcon.org/track/splash2014-artifacts OOPSLA 2014] and [http://adapt-workshop.org/2014 ADAPT 2014]. Our eventual goal is to develop the common evaluation methodology gradually and collaboratively. See [http://artifact-eval.org artifact-eval.org] and [http://c-mind.org/reproducibility c-mind.org/reproducibility] for more details. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| − | | style="width: | + | | style="width: 35%" valign="top" | |
<span style="font-size:large">'''<span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">Artifact Evaluation Committee (AEC)</span>'''</span> | <span style="font-size:large">'''<span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">Artifact Evaluation Committee (AEC)</span>'''</span> | ||
| Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
*Michael Laurenzano, UMich, USA | *Michael Laurenzano, UMich, USA | ||
| − | | style="width: | + | | style="width: 37%" valign="top" | |
<span style="font-size:large">'''<span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">Above threshold</span>'''</span> | <span style="font-size:large">'''<span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">Above threshold</span>'''</span> | ||
| − | Here | + | Here is a list of papers with artifacts above threshold: |
| − | <p style="text-align: center"> | + | |
| + | *'''''NUMA-aware Graph-structured Analytics'''''<br/>Hee-Seok Kim, Izzat El Hajj, John Stratton, Steven Lumetta and Wen-Mei Hwu<br/> | ||
| + | *<span>'''''MemorySanitizer: fast detector of uninitialized memory use in C++'''''<br/>Evgeniy Stepanov and Konstantin Serebryany</span><br/> | ||
| + | *'''''A Parallel Abstract Interpreter for JavaScript'''''<br/>Kyle Dewey, Vineeth Kashyap and Ben Hardekopf<br/> | ||
| + | *'''''A Graph-Based Higher-Order Intermediate Representation'''''<br/>Roland Leißa, Marcel Köster and Sebastian Hack<br/> | ||
| + | *'''''Optimizing the flash-RAM energy trade-off in deeply embedded systems'''''<br/>James Pallister, Kerstin Eder and Simon J. Hollis<br/> | ||
| + | *'''''Scalable Conditional Induction Variable (CIV) Analysis'''''<br/>Cosmin E. Oancea and Lawrence Rauchwerger | ||
| + | <p style="text-align: center"></p><p style="text-align: center">'''[http://cTuning.org cTuning foundation] provided a prize of ~500$ for a distinguished artifact from CGO or PPoPP (will be announced at the conference).'''</p> | ||
<span style="font-size:large">'''<span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">Discussions</span>'''</span> | <span style="font-size:large">'''<span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">Discussions</span>'''</span> | ||
Revision as of 14:32, 16 December 2014
 |
Artifact Evaluation for CGO'15 |
| Important dates
Packaging guidelines We use the following guidelines for artifacts. Because we want to encourage as many of you as possible to submit, these are only guidelines, not hard rules. Of course, if the material you want us to evaluate is fairly standard, following these suggestions will greatly simplify our lives. After all, remember: You want us to be able to evaluate your artifact, don't you? How to submit Please read the guidelines on what to submit. Please upload your submission to EasyChair (common with PPoPP). Review process The review process is described in detail here. Prior Artifact Evaluation Artifacts have been already evaluated at several conferences and workshops including recent PLDI 2014, OOPSLA 2014 and ADAPT 2014. Our eventual goal is to develop the common evaluation methodology gradually and collaboratively. See artifact-eval.org and c-mind.org/reproducibility for more details. |
Artifact Evaluation Committee (AEC) Chairs:
Advisory board:
Committee members:
Committee members:
|
Above threshold Here is a list of papers with artifacts above threshold:
cTuning foundation provided a prize of ~500$ for a distinguished artifact from CGO or PPoPP (will be announced at the conference). Discussions We consider AE as a continuous learning curve. If you have questions or comments and suggestions on how to improve packaging and reviewing process, please get in touch or use our public Google or LinkedIn groups. We will hold a joint public CGO/PPoPP AE discussion session on December 9th, 2015.
|
Sponsors and supporters
