| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
<sup>1</sup> EPCC, University of Edinburgh, UK<br/><sup>2</sup> WAIS, University of Southampton, UK<br/><sup>3</sup> University of Manchester, UK<br/><sup>4</sup> Oxford eResearch Centre, Oxford University, UK | <sup>1</sup> EPCC, University of Edinburgh, UK<br/><sup>2</sup> WAIS, University of Southampton, UK<br/><sup>3</sup> University of Manchester, UK<br/><sup>4</sup> Oxford eResearch Centre, Oxford University, UK | ||
| + | |||
| + | [ [http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2618137.2618140 Paper in ACM DL] ] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 44: | Line 46: | ||
| valign="top" | '''Academia 2.0: removing the publisher middle-man while retaining impact''' | | valign="top" | '''Academia 2.0: removing the publisher middle-man while retaining impact''' | ||
''Raphael Poss<sup>1</sup>, Sebastian Altmeyer<sup>1</sup>,Mark Thompson<sup>2</sup>, Rob Jelier<sup>3</sup>''<br/><sup>1</sup> University of Amsterdam, Netherlands<br/><sup>2</sup> L.U.M.C., Netherlands<br/><sup>3</sup> KU Leuven, Belgium | ''Raphael Poss<sup>1</sup>, Sebastian Altmeyer<sup>1</sup>,Mark Thompson<sup>2</sup>, Rob Jelier<sup>3</sup>''<br/><sup>1</sup> University of Amsterdam, Netherlands<br/><sup>2</sup> L.U.M.C., Netherlands<br/><sup>3</sup> KU Leuven, Belgium | ||
| + | |||
| + | [ [http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2618137.2618141 Paper in ACM DL] ] | ||
|- style="background:#CFCFFF; color:black" | |- style="background:#CFCFFF; color:black" | ||
| Line 59: | Line 63: | ||
| valign="top" | '''Falsifiability of network security research: the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly''' | | valign="top" | '''Falsifiability of network security research: the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly''' | ||
''Dennis Gamayunov, ''Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russia | ''Dennis Gamayunov, ''Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russia | ||
| + | |||
| + | [ [http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2618137.2618141 Paper in ACM DL] ] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 64: | Line 70: | ||
| valign="top" | '''[http://reproducible.io CARE], the Comprehensive Archiver for Reproducible Execution''' | | valign="top" | '''[http://reproducible.io CARE], the Comprehensive Archiver for Reproducible Execution''' | ||
''Yves Janin, Cedric Vincent and Remi Duraffort''<br/>STMicroelectronics, France | ''Yves Janin, Cedric Vincent and Remi Duraffort''<br/>STMicroelectronics, France | ||
| + | |||
| + | [ [http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2618137.2618138 Paper in ACM DL] ] | ||
|- style="background:#CFCFFF; color:black" | |- style="background:#CFCFFF; color:black" | ||
| Line 71: | Line 79: | ||
<sup>1</sup> Purdue University, USA <sup>2</sup> Brown University, USA <sup>3</sup> University of Edinburgh, UK <sup>4</sup> INRIA, France | <sup>1</sup> Purdue University, USA <sup>2</sup> Brown University, USA <sup>3</sup> University of Edinburgh, UK <sup>4</sup> INRIA, France | ||
| + | |||
| + | [ [http://www.slideshare.net/GrigoriFursin/panel-at-acmsigplantrust2014 Slides] ] [ [http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2618137.2618142 Paper in ACM DL] ] | ||
|} | |} | ||
| Line 145: | Line 155: | ||
*[http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2618142 Our new proposal to <span data-scayt_word="crowdsource" data-scaytid="95">crowdsource</span> reviewing of publications and artifacts] | *[http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2618142 Our new proposal to <span data-scayt_word="crowdsource" data-scaytid="95">crowdsource</span> reviewing of publications and artifacts] | ||
| − | *[http://www.artifact-eval.org Artifact Evaluation for software conferences] ; [http://www.artifact-eval.org/guidelines.html Guidelines for packaging artifacts for submissions] | + | *[http://www.artifact-eval.org Artifact Evaluation for software conferences] ; [http://www.artifact-eval.org/guidelines.html Guidelines for packaging artifacts for submissions] |
*<span style="font-size:small">[http://adapt-workshop.org/program.htm ADAPT panel on reproducible research methodologies and new publication models] (January 2014)</span> | *<span style="font-size:small">[http://adapt-workshop.org/program.htm ADAPT panel on reproducible research methodologies and new publication models] (January 2014)</span> | ||
*<span style="font-size:small">[http://hal.inria.fr/inria-00436029/ GCC Summit'09 discussion]</span> | *<span style="font-size:small">[http://hal.inria.fr/inria-00436029/ GCC Summit'09 discussion]</span> | ||
Revision as of 12:59, 16 June 2014
   Important dates:
LinkedIn group [ Link ] Collective Mind project:
OCCAM project [ Link ] Special journal issue IEEE TETC [ Link ] Artifact evaluation for software conferences [ Link ] Sponsors If your company or institution is interested to become our sponsor, please don't hesitate to contact us !
|
ACM SIGPLAN TRUST 2014 @ PLDI 2014 1st Workshop on Reproducible Research Methodologies June 12, 2014 (afternoon), Edinburgh, UK We particularly focus on technological aspects to enable reproducible research and experimentation on program and architecture empirical analysis, optimization, simulation, co-design and run-time adaptation. Panel on conference artifact evaluation experience
Final program Proceedings in ACM Digital Library
Workshop organizers
Program committee
Call for papers It becomes excessively challenging or even impossible to capture, share and accurately reproduce experimental results in computer engineering for fair and trustable evaluation and future improvement. This is often due to ever rising complexity of the design, analysis and optimization of computer systems, increasing number of ad-hoc tools, interfaces and techniques, lack of a common experimental methodology, and lack of simple and unified mechanisms, tools and repositories to preserve and exchange knowledge apart from numerous publications where reproducibility is often not even considered. This ACM SIGPLAN workshop is intended to become an interdisciplinary forum for academic and industrial researchers, practitioners and developers in computer engineering to discuss challenges, ideas, experience, trustable and reproducible research methodologies, practical techniques, tools and repositories to:
Submission guidelines Easychair submission website is now closed. We invite papers in three categories (please use these prefixes for your submission title):
Submissions should be in PDF formatted with double column/single-spacing using 10pt fonts and printable on US letter or A4 sized paper using standard ACM LaTeX2e template. All papers will be peer-reviewed. The authors will have a choice to publish accepted papers at the conference website (that will not prevent later publication of extended papers) or in the ACM Digital Library (International Conference Proceedings Series; ISBN 978-1-4503-2918-7). Important dates
Assorted related projects, initiatives and tools
Assorted tools
|
