Line 8: Line 8:
 
*[http://cacm.acm.org/blogs/blog-cacm/98560 Reviewing peer review], Jeannette M. Wing, ACM Blog
 
*[http://cacm.acm.org/blogs/blog-cacm/98560 Reviewing peer review], Jeannette M. Wing, ACM Blog
 
*[http://cacm.acm.org/blogs/blog-cacm/100284 How Should Peer Review Evolve?], Ed H. Chi, ACM Blog
 
*[http://cacm.acm.org/blogs/blog-cacm/100284 How Should Peer Review Evolve?], Ed H. Chi, ACM Blog
 +
*[http://crd.lbl.gov/~dhbailey/dhbpapers/twelve-ways.pdf Twelve Ways to Fool the Masses When Giving Performance Results on Parallel Computers],  David H. Bailey, Supercomputing Review, June 11, 1991
 +
*[Ten Ways to Fool the Masses When Giving Performance Results on GPUs], Scott Pakin, HPCWire, December 13, 2011
 
*[http://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/new-gold-standard-established-for-open-and-reproducible-research Cambridge University news about open and reproducible research]
 
*[http://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/new-gold-standard-established-for-open-and-reproducible-research Cambridge University news about open and reproducible research]
 
*[http://reproduciblescience.blogspot.fr/2015/06/interesting-replicable-badge-for.html Interesting Replicable "Badge" for journal articles], Daniel S. Katz
 
*[http://reproduciblescience.blogspot.fr/2015/06/interesting-replicable-badge-for.html Interesting Replicable "Badge" for journal articles], Daniel S. Katz

Revision as of 09:09, 24 September 2015

[ Back to main page ]

Assorted articles and presentations

Journals with artifact sharing and evaluation

National requirements


(C) 2011-2014 cTuning foundation