(→Assorted articles and presentations) |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*[http://reproduciblescience.blogspot.fr/2015/06/interesting-replicable-badge-for.html Interesting Replicable "Badge" for journal articles], Daniel S. Katz | *[http://reproduciblescience.blogspot.fr/2015/06/interesting-replicable-badge-for.html Interesting Replicable "Badge" for journal articles], Daniel S. Katz | ||
*[http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/122-a188 Research Wranglers: Initiatives to Improve Reproducibility of Study Findings] (Environmental Health Perspectives) | *[http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/122-a188 Research Wranglers: Initiatives to Improve Reproducibility of Study Findings] (Environmental Health Perspectives) | ||
| + | *[https://web.stanford.edu/~vcs/talks/VictoriaStoddenICML2010.pdf Reproducible Research in Computational Science: Problems and Solutions For Data and Code Sharing], Victoria Stodden, ICML workshop 2010 | ||
*[http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/32426/title/Predatory-Publishing Predatory publishing] | *[http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/32426/title/Predatory-Publishing Predatory publishing] | ||
*[http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/three-myths-about-scientific-peer-review Three myths about scientific peer review] | *[http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/three-myths-about-scientific-peer-review Three myths about scientific peer review] | ||
Revision as of 07:50, 24 September 2015
Assorted articles and presentations
- Our experience report with encountered problems in computer systems' research and new proposal for community-driven reviewing and validation of publications [arXiv , ACM DL]
- Science's Reproducibility Problem, Bob Grant, The Scientist
- From Repeatability to Reproducibility and Corroboration, Dror G. Feitelson, SIGOPS Operating Syst. Rev. 49(1), pp. 3-11, Jan 2015
- Reviewing peer review, Jeannette M. Wing, ACM Blog
- How Should Peer Review Evolve?, Ed H. Chi, ACM Blog
- Cambridge University news about open and reproducible research
- Interesting Replicable "Badge" for journal articles, Daniel S. Katz
- Research Wranglers: Initiatives to Improve Reproducibility of Study Findings (Environmental Health Perspectives)
- Reproducible Research in Computational Science: Problems and Solutions For Data and Code Sharing, Victoria Stodden, ICML workshop 2010
- Predatory publishing
- Three myths about scientific peer review
- The repeatability experiment of SIGMOD 2008, SIGMOD Record, vol. 37, no. 1 (March 2008), 39-45.
- "Begin with an Author's response to Reviews" - proposal to submit past reviews along with articles
- Presentation by Professor Carole Goble
- Dennis McCafferty, "Should Code be Released?"
- Special section on Data replication & reproducibility, Science magazine, 2 December 2011
- Chris Drummond, "Replicability is not Reproducibility: Nor is it Good Science"
- Science is in a reproducibility crisis - how do we resolve it?
- My blog article on "Automatic performance tuning and reproducibility as a side effect" for the Software Sustainability Institute
- Puzzling Measurement of "Big G" Gravitational Constant Ignites Debate
- White House takes notice of reproducibility in science, and wants your opinion
- Problems during performance benchmarking:
- [https://homes.cs.washington.edu/~bornholt/post/performance-evaluation.html]
We also experienced many similar issues during our work on auto-tuning and machine learning: - [http://hal.inria.fr/hal-01054763]
- [http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.4020]
- [https://homes.cs.washington.edu/~bornholt/post/performance-evaluation.html]
- ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review - Special Issue on Repeatability and Sharing of Experimental Artifacts
- Vinton G. Cerf. "Bit Rot: Long-Term Preservation of Digital Information" [Point of View]
- About citations: less related though interesting
Journals with artifact evaluation:
