Difference between revisions of "Reproducibility:AE:CGO2015"

Revision as of 16:39, 8 February 2015

Artifact Evaluation for CGO'15

Important dates

CGO paper decision:
~~10 Nov 2014~~
Artifact submission:
~~18 Nov 2014 AoE~~
Technical clarification:
~~10-12 Dec 2014~~
Decision announced:
~~16 Dec 2014~~
Public discussion:
9 Feb 2015

Packaging guidelines

We use the following guidelines for artifacts. Because we want to encourage as many of you as possible to submit, these are only guidelines, not hard rules. Of course, if the material you want us to evaluate is fairly standard, following these suggestions will greatly simplify our lives. After all, remember: You want us to be able to evaluate your artifact, don't you?

How to submit

Please read the guidelines on what to submit. Please upload your submission to EasyChair (common with PPoPP).

Review process

The review process is described in detail here.

Artifact Evaluation Committee (AEC)

Chairs:

Grigori Fursin, cTuning foundation, France
Bruce R. Childers, University of Pittsburgh, USA

Advisory board:

Shriram Krishnamurthi, Brown University, USA

Committee members:

David Boehme, LLNL, USA
Santiago Bock, University of Pittsburgh, USA
Lingda Li, Rutgers University, USA
Lin Ma, Huawei America Research Lab, USA
Yiannis Nikolakopulos, Chalmers University, Sweden
Jeeva Paudel, University of Alberta, Canada
Paul Thomson, Imperial College London, UK
Peter Libic, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic
Dave Wilkinson, University of Pittsburgh, USA
Weiwei Chen, Qualcomm, USA
Riyadh Baghdadi, ENS and University Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France
Na Meng, University of Texas Austin, USA
Arun Raman, Qualcomm, USA
Bapi Chatterjee, Chalmers University, Sweden
Martin Maas, University of California Berkeley, USA
Vojtech Horky, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic
Vasileios Trigonakis, EPFL, Switzerland
Mahdi Eslamimehr, SAP Labs, USA
Yuhao Zhu, University of Texas Austin, USA
Melanie Kambadur, Columbia University, USA
Michael Laurenzano, UMich, USA

Above threshold

List of papers with artifacts above threshold:

Locality-Centric Thread Scheduling for Bulk-synchronous Programming Models on CPU Architectures
Hee-Seok Kim, Izzat El Hajj, John Stratton, Steven Lumetta and Wen-Mei Hwu
MemorySanitizer: fast detector of uninitialized memory use in C++
Evgeniy Stepanov and Konstantin Serebryany
A Parallel Abstract Interpreter for JavaScript
Kyle Dewey, Vineeth Kashyap and Ben Hardekopf
A Graph-Based Higher-Order Intermediate Representation
Roland Leißa, Marcel Köster and Sebastian Hack
Optimizing the flash-RAM energy trade-off in deeply embedded systems
James Pallister, Kerstin Eder and Simon J. Hollis
Scalable Conditional Induction Variable (CIV) Analysis
Cosmin E. Oancea and Lawrence Rauchwerger

Prize

Nvidia and cTuning foundation will provide prizes for highest ranked artifacts from CGO and PPoPP (will be announced at the conference).

Discussions

We consider AE as a continuous learning curve. If you have questions or comments and suggestions on how to improve packaging and reviewing process, please get in touch or use our public Google or LinkedIn groups. We will hold a joint public CGO/PPoPP AE discussion session on February 9th, 2015.

Prior Artifact Evaluation

Artifacts have been already evaluated at several conferences and workshops including recent PLDI 2014, OOPSLA 2014 and ADAPT 2014. Our eventual goal is to develop common evaluation methodology gradually and collaboratively. See artifact-eval.org, cknowledge.org/reproducibility and mailing list for more details.

Sponsors and supporters

@@ Line 91: / Line 91: @@
 <span style="font-size:large">'''<span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">Prior Artifact Evaluation</span>'''</span>
-Artifacts have been already evaluated at several conferences and workshops including recent [http://pldi14-aec.cs.brown.edu PLDI 2014], [http://2014.splashcon.org/track/splash2014-artifacts OOPSLA 2014] and [http://adapt-workshop.org/2014 ADAPT 2014]. Our eventual goal is to develop common evaluation methodology gradually and collaboratively. See [http://artifact-eval.org artifact-eval.org] and [http://cknowledge.org/reproducibility cknowledge.org/reproducibility] for more details.
+Artifacts have been already evaluated at several conferences and workshops including recent [http://pldi14-aec.cs.brown.edu PLDI 2014], [http://2014.splashcon.org/track/splash2014-artifacts OOPSLA 2014] and [http://adapt-workshop.org/2014 ADAPT 2014]. Our eventual goal is to develop common evaluation methodology gradually and collaboratively. See [http://artifact-eval.org artifact-eval.org], [http://cknowledge.org/reproducibility cknowledge.org/reproducibility] and [https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/collective-mind mailing list] for more details.
 |}