| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
{| style="width: 97%" border="0" cellpadding="20" cellspacing="1" | {| style="width: 97%" border="0" cellpadding="20" cellspacing="1" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | style="width: | + | | style="width: 25%" valign="top" | <div class="span4"> |
<span style="font-size:large">'''<span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">Important dates</span>'''</span> | <span style="font-size:large">'''<span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">Important dates</span>'''</span> | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
*Artifact submission: <strike>'''18 Nov 2014 AoE'''</strike> | *Artifact submission: <strike>'''18 Nov 2014 AoE'''</strike> | ||
*Technical clarification: <strike>'''10-12 Dec 2014'''</strike> | *Technical clarification: <strike>'''10-12 Dec 2014'''</strike> | ||
| − | *Decision announced: '''16 Dec 2014''' | + | *Decision announced: <strike>'''16 Dec 2014'''</strike> |
*Public discussion: '''9 Feb 2015''' | *Public discussion: '''9 Feb 2015''' | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
Artifacts have been already evaluated at several conferences and workshops including recent [http://pldi14-aec.cs.brown.edu PLDI 2014], [http://2014.splashcon.org/track/splash2014-artifacts OOPSLA 2014] and [http://adapt-workshop.org/2014 ADAPT 2014]. Our eventual goal is to develop the common evaluation methodology gradually and collaboratively. See [http://artifact-eval.org artifact-eval.org] and [http://c-mind.org/reproducibility c-mind.org/reproducibility] for more details. | Artifacts have been already evaluated at several conferences and workshops including recent [http://pldi14-aec.cs.brown.edu PLDI 2014], [http://2014.splashcon.org/track/splash2014-artifacts OOPSLA 2014] and [http://adapt-workshop.org/2014 ADAPT 2014]. Our eventual goal is to develop the common evaluation methodology gradually and collaboratively. See [http://artifact-eval.org artifact-eval.org] and [http://c-mind.org/reproducibility c-mind.org/reproducibility] for more details. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| − | | style="width: | + | | style="width: 35%" valign="top" | |
<span style="font-size:large">'''<span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">Artifact Evaluation Committee (AEC)</span>'''</span> | <span style="font-size:large">'''<span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">Artifact Evaluation Committee (AEC)</span>'''</span> | ||
| Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
*Michael Laurenzano, UMich, USA | *Michael Laurenzano, UMich, USA | ||
| − | | style="width: | + | | style="width: 37%" valign="top" | |
<span style="font-size:large">'''<span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">Above threshold</span>'''</span> | <span style="font-size:large">'''<span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">Above threshold</span>'''</span> | ||
| − | + | List of papers with artifacts above threshold: | |
| − | <p style="text-align: center">'''''[http://cTuning.org cTuning foundation] provided a | + | |
| + | *'''''NUMA-aware Graph-structured Analytics'''''<br/>Kaiyuan Zhang, Rong Chen and Haibo Chen<br/> | ||
| + | *'''''Predicate RCU: An RCU for Scalable Concurrent Updates'''''<br/>Maya Arbel and Adam Morrison<br/> | ||
| + | *'''''Scalable and Efficient Implementation of 3D Unstructured Meshes Computation: A Case Study on Matrix Assembly'''''<br/>Loïc Thébault, Eric Petit and Quang Dinh<br/> | ||
| + | *'''''VirtCL: A Framework for OpenCL Device Abstraction and Management''<br/>'''Yi-Ping You, Hen-Jung Wu, Yeh-Ning Tsai and Yen-Ting Chao'''<br/>''' | ||
| + | *'''''Dynamic deadlock verification for general barrier synchronisation<br/>'''''Tiago Cogumbreiro, Raymond Hu, Francisco Martins and Nobuko Yoshida'''<br/>''' | ||
| + | *'''''Low-Overhead Software Transactional Memory with Progress Guarantees and Strong Semantics<br/>'''''Minjia Zhang, Jipeng Huang, Man Cao and Michael Bond'''''<br/>''''' | ||
| + | *'''''The SprayList: A Scalable Relaxed Priority Queue<br/>'''''Justin Kopinsky, Dan Alistarh, Jerry Li and Nir Shavit<br/> | ||
| + | *'''''Performance Implications of Dynamic Memory Allocators on Transactional Memory Systems'''''<br/>Alexandro Baldassin, Edson Borin and Guido Araujo<br/> | ||
| + | *'''''More than You Ever Wanted to Know about Synchronization'''''<br/>Vincent Gramoli<br/> | ||
| + | *'''''Cache-Oblivious Wavefront: Improving Parallelism of Recursive DP Algorithms without Losing Cache-efficiency'''''<br/>Yuan Tang, Ronghui You, Haibin Kan, Jesmin Tithi, Pramod Ganapathi and Rezaul Chowdhury<br/> | ||
| + | <p style="text-align: center">'''''[http://cTuning.org cTuning foundation] provided a prize of ~500$ for a distinguished artifact from CGO or PPoPP (will be announced at the conference).'''''</p> | ||
<span style="font-size:large">'''<span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">Discussions</span>'''</span> | <span style="font-size:large">'''<span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">Discussions</span>'''</span> | ||
Revision as of 14:38, 16 December 2014
 |
Artifact Evaluation for PPoPP'15 |
| Important dates
Packaging guidelines We use the following guidelines for artifacts. Because we want to encourage as many of you as possible to submit, these are only guidelines, not hard rules. Of course, if the material you want us to evaluate is fairly standard, following these suggestions will greatly simplify our lives. After all, remember: You want us to be able to evaluate your artifact, don't you? How to submit Please read the guidelines on what to submit. Please upload your submission to EasyChair (common with CGO). Review process The review process is described in detail here. Prior Artifact Evaluation Artifacts have been already evaluated at several conferences and workshops including recent PLDI 2014, OOPSLA 2014 and ADAPT 2014. Our eventual goal is to develop the common evaluation methodology gradually and collaboratively. See artifact-eval.org and c-mind.org/reproducibility for more details. |
Artifact Evaluation Committee (AEC) Chairs:
Advisory board:
Committee members:
|
Above threshold List of papers with artifacts above threshold:
cTuning foundation provided a prize of ~500$ for a distinguished artifact from CGO or PPoPP (will be announced at the conference). Discussions We consider AE as a continuous learning curve. If you have questions or comments and suggestions on how to improve packaging and reviewing process, please get in touch or use our public Google or LinkedIn groups. We will hold a joint public CGO/PPoPP AE discussion session on December 9th, 2015. |
Sponsors and supporters
