Line 54: Line 54:
 
Here will be a list of papers with artifacts above threshold.
 
Here will be a list of papers with artifacts above threshold.
 
<p style="text-align: center">'''''[http://cTuning.org cTuning foundation] provided a cash prize of 500$ for a distinguished artifact from CGO or PPoPP.'''''</p>
 
<p style="text-align: center">'''''[http://cTuning.org cTuning foundation] provided a cash prize of 500$ for a distinguished artifact from CGO or PPoPP.'''''</p>
 +
<span style="font-size:large">'''<span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">Discussions</span>'''</span>
 +
 +
We consider AE as a continuous learning curve. If you have questions or comments and suggestions on how to improve packaging and reviewing process, please get in touch or use our public [https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/collective-mind Google] or [http://www.linkedin.com/groups/Reproducible-research-experimentation-in-computer-7433414 LinkedIn] groups.
 +
 +
 +
 
|}
 
|}
  

Revision as of 10:19, 5 November 2014

Ae-stamp-cgo.png

Artifact Evaluation for CGO'15

[ Back to CGO'15 conference website ]


Important dates

  • CGO paper decision notification: November 3, 2014
  • Arfiact submission deadline: November 14, 2014
  • Decision announced: December 15, 2014

Packaging guidelines

We use the following guidelines for artifacts. Because we want to encourage as many of you as possible to submit, these are only guidelines, not hard rules. Of course, if the material you want us to evaluate is fairly standard, following these suggestions will greatly simplify our lives. After all, remember: You want us to be able to evaluate your artifact, don't you?

How to submit

Please read the guidelines on what to submit. Please upload your submission to EasyChair (common with PPoPP).

Review process

The review process is described in detail here.

Artifact Evaluation Committee (AEC)

Chairs:

Advisory board:

Committee members:

  • Will be nominated by CGO PC members and AEC chairs

Prior Artifact Evaluation

Artifacts have been already evaluated at several conferences and workshops including recent PLDI 2014, OOPSLA 2014 and ADAPT 2014. Our eventual goal is to develop the common evaluation methodology gradually and collaboratively. See artifact-eval.org and c-mind.org/reproducibility for more details.

Above threshold

Here will be a list of papers with artifacts above threshold.

cTuning foundation provided a cash prize of 500$ for a distinguished artifact from CGO or PPoPP.

Discussions

We consider AE as a continuous learning curve. If you have questions or comments and suggestions on how to improve packaging and reviewing process, please get in touch or use our public Google or LinkedIn groups.




Sponsors and supporters

CTuning foundation logo1.png



(C) 2011-2014 cTuning foundation