| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*[http://reproducibleresearch.net/blog Reproducible Research blog] | *[http://reproducibleresearch.net/blog Reproducible Research blog] | ||
*[http://reproduciblescience.org Reproducible Science project] | *[http://reproduciblescience.org Reproducible Science project] | ||
| − | |||
*[http://matt.might.net/articles/crapl CRAPL license] | *[http://matt.might.net/articles/crapl CRAPL license] | ||
| − | |||
*[http://reproducibility.cs.arizona.edu Reproducibility in Computer Science] | *[http://reproducibility.cs.arizona.edu Reproducibility in Computer Science] | ||
*[http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1536616.1536619 "Begin with an Author's response to Reviews" - Proposal to improve paper reviewing (submitting past reviews)] | *[http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1536616.1536619 "Begin with an Author's response to Reviews" - Proposal to improve paper reviewing (submitting past reviews)] | ||
Revision as of 13:59, 10 July 2014
- Working towards Sustainable Software for Science: Practice and Experiences
- Artifact evaluation at OOSPLA'13
- Artifact evaluation at PLDI'14
- Evaluate project
- Reproducible Research blog
- Reproducible Science project
- CRAPL license
- Reproducibility in Computer Science
- "Begin with an Author's response to Reviews" - Proposal to improve paper reviewing (submitting past reviews)
- OCCAM project for reproducible computer architecture simulation
- Artifact Evaluation for software conferences ; Guidelines for packaging artifacts for submissions
- Structured Commons initiative
