(Replaced content with "Moved to [https://github.com/ctuning/ck/wiki/Enabling-open-science-articles GitHub].")
 
(19 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[ '''''[[Reproducibility|Back to main page]]''''' ]
+
Moved to [https://github.com/ctuning/ck/wiki/Enabling-open-science-articles GitHub].
 
+
=== '''Assorted articles and presentations'''<br/> ===
+
 
+
*Our Experience report and new proposal: ''community-driven reviewing and validation of publications'' [[http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.4020 arXiv] , [http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2618142 ACM DL]]
+
*[http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/122-a188 Research Wranglers: Initiatives to Improve Reproducibility of Study Findings] (Environmental Health Perspectives)
+
*[http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/32426/title/Predatory-Publishing Predatory publishing]
+
*[http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/three-myths-about-scientific-peer-review Three myths about scientific peer review]
+
*[http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1536616.1536619 "Begin with an Author's response to Reviews"] - proposal to submit past reviews along with articles
+
*[https://www.dropbox.com/s/67n49i9k3cb28mo/GOBLE-CW2014.ppt Presentation by Professor Carole Goble]
+
*Dennis McCafferty, [http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1831415 "Should Code be Released?"]
+
*Chris Drummond, [http://cogprints.org/7691/7/ICMLws09.pdf "Replicability is not Reproducibility: Nor is it Good Science"]
+
*[http://theconversation.com/science-is-in-a-reproducibility-crisis-how-do-we-resolve-it-16998 Science is in a reproducibility crisis - how do we resolve it?]
+
*My blog article on [http://www.software.ac.uk/blog/2014-07-22-automatic-performance-tuning-and-reproducibility-side-effect "Automatic performance tuning and reproducibility as a side effect"]&nbsp; for the Software Sustainability Institute
+
*[http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/puzzling-measurement-of-big-g-gravitational-constant-ignites-debate-slide-show/ Puzzling Measurement of "Big G" Gravitational Constant Ignites Debate]
+
*[http://retractionwatch.com/2014/09/05/white-house-takes-notice-of-reproducibility-in-science-and-wants-your-opinion White House takes notice of reproducibility in science, and wants your opinion]
+

Latest revision as of 13:36, 13 September 2016

Moved to GitHub.


(C) 2011-2014 cTuning foundation