| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
=== '''Assorted articles and presentations'''<br/> === | === '''Assorted articles and presentations'''<br/> === | ||
| − | *Our | + | *Our experience report with encountered problems in computer systems' research and new proposal for ''community-driven reviewing and validation of publications'' [[http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.4020 arXiv] , [http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2618142 ACM DL]] |
| + | *[http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/33719/title/Science-s-Reproducibility-Problem Science's Reproducibility Problem], Bob Grant, The Scientist | ||
| + | *[http://www.cs.huji.ac.il/~feit/papers/Repeat15SIGOPS.pdf From Repeatability to Reproducibility and Corroboration], Dror G. Feitelson, SIGOPS Operating Syst. Rev. 49(1), pp. 3-11, Jan 2015 | ||
| + | *[http://cacm.acm.org/blogs/blog-cacm/98560 Reviewing peer review], Jeannette M. Wing, ACM Blog | ||
| + | *[http://cacm.acm.org/blogs/blog-cacm/100284 How Should Peer Review Evolve?], Ed H. Chi, ACM Blog | ||
| + | *[http://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/new-gold-standard-established-for-open-and-reproducible-research Cambridge University news about open and reproducible research] | ||
| + | *[http://reproduciblescience.blogspot.fr/2015/06/interesting-replicable-badge-for.html Interesting Replicable "Badge" for journal articles], Daniel S. Katz | ||
*[http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/122-a188 Research Wranglers: Initiatives to Improve Reproducibility of Study Findings] (Environmental Health Perspectives) | *[http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/122-a188 Research Wranglers: Initiatives to Improve Reproducibility of Study Findings] (Environmental Health Perspectives) | ||
*[http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/32426/title/Predatory-Publishing Predatory publishing] | *[http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/32426/title/Predatory-Publishing Predatory publishing] | ||
Revision as of 13:33, 24 September 2015
Assorted articles and presentations
- Our experience report with encountered problems in computer systems' research and new proposal for community-driven reviewing and validation of publications [arXiv , ACM DL]
- Science's Reproducibility Problem, Bob Grant, The Scientist
- From Repeatability to Reproducibility and Corroboration, Dror G. Feitelson, SIGOPS Operating Syst. Rev. 49(1), pp. 3-11, Jan 2015
- Reviewing peer review, Jeannette M. Wing, ACM Blog
- How Should Peer Review Evolve?, Ed H. Chi, ACM Blog
- Cambridge University news about open and reproducible research
- Interesting Replicable "Badge" for journal articles, Daniel S. Katz
- Research Wranglers: Initiatives to Improve Reproducibility of Study Findings (Environmental Health Perspectives)
- Predatory publishing
- Three myths about scientific peer review
- "Begin with an Author's response to Reviews" - proposal to submit past reviews along with articles
- Presentation by Professor Carole Goble
- Dennis McCafferty, "Should Code be Released?"
- Chris Drummond, "Replicability is not Reproducibility: Nor is it Good Science"
- Science is in a reproducibility crisis - how do we resolve it?
- My blog article on "Automatic performance tuning and reproducibility as a side effect" for the Software Sustainability Institute
- Puzzling Measurement of "Big G" Gravitational Constant Ignites Debate
- White House takes notice of reproducibility in science, and wants your opinion
- Problems during performance benchmarking:
- [https://homes.cs.washington.edu/~bornholt/post/performance-evaluation.html]
We also experienced many similar issues during our work on auto-tuning and machine learning: - [http://hal.inria.fr/hal-01054763]
- [http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.4020]
- [https://homes.cs.washington.edu/~bornholt/post/performance-evaluation.html]
- ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review - Special Issue on Repeatability and Sharing of Experimental Artifacts
- Vinton G. Cerf. "Bit Rot: Long-Term Preservation of Digital Information" [Point of View]
- About citations: less related though interesting
Journals with artifact evaluation:
