| (14 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|} | |} | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | '''<span style="font-size:large; font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">Prizes for 2 highest ranked artifacts</span>''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | {| border="0" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="1" | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | style="text-align: center; width:450px" valign="top" | | ||
| + | <span style="color:#ff0000">'''<span style="font-size: larger">1st place</span>'''</span> sponsored by<br/>[[File:NVLogo 2D resize.jpg|NVLogo 2D resize.jpg|link=http://nvidia.com]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | | style="text-align: center; width:450px" valign="top" | | ||
| + | <span style="color:#ff0000"><span style="font-size: larger">'''2nd place'''</span></span> sponsored by<br/>[[File:CTuning foundation logo1a.png|CTuning foundation logo1a.png|link=http://cTuning.org]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | style="text-align: center" | | ||
| + | "Nvidia Quadro K6000" for<br/>'''"The SprayList: A scalable relaxed priority queue"'''<br/>Justin Kopinsky, Dan Alistarh, Jerry Li and Nir Shavit | ||
| + | |||
| + | | style="text-align: center" | | ||
| + | "Acer C720P" for<br/>'''"A graph-based higher-order intermediate representation"'''<br/>Roland Leißa, Marcel Köster and Sebastian Hack | ||
| + | |||
| + | |} | ||
---- | ---- | ||
{| style="width: 97%" border="0" cellpadding="20" cellspacing="1" | {| style="width: 97%" border="0" cellpadding="20" cellspacing="1" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | style="width: | + | | style="width: 25%" valign="top" | <div class="span4"> |
<span style="font-size:large">'''<span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">Important dates</span>'''</span> | <span style="font-size:large">'''<span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">Important dates</span>'''</span> | ||
| − | *PPoPP paper decision | + | *PPoPP paper decision:<br/><strike>'''10 Nov 2014'''</strike> |
| − | *Artifact submission | + | *Artifact submission:<br/><strike>'''18 Nov 2014 AoE'''</strike> |
| − | *Technical clarification: '''10-12 Dec''''''2014''' | + | *Technical clarification:<br/><strike>'''10-12 Dec 2014'''</strike> |
| − | * | + | *Decision announced:<br/><strike>'''16 Dec 2014'''</strike> |
| + | *Public discussion:<br/><strike>'''9 Feb 2015'''</strike> [ [http://www.slideshare.net/GrigoriFursin/presentation-fursin-aecgoppopp2015 Slides] ] | ||
<span style="font-size:large">'''<span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">Packaging guidelines</span>'''</span> | <span style="font-size:large">'''<span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">Packaging guidelines</span>'''</span> | ||
| Line 34: | Line 54: | ||
Artifacts have been already evaluated at several conferences and workshops including recent [http://pldi14-aec.cs.brown.edu PLDI 2014], [http://2014.splashcon.org/track/splash2014-artifacts OOPSLA 2014] and [http://adapt-workshop.org/2014 ADAPT 2014]. Our eventual goal is to develop the common evaluation methodology gradually and collaboratively. See [http://artifact-eval.org artifact-eval.org] and [http://c-mind.org/reproducibility c-mind.org/reproducibility] for more details. | Artifacts have been already evaluated at several conferences and workshops including recent [http://pldi14-aec.cs.brown.edu PLDI 2014], [http://2014.splashcon.org/track/splash2014-artifacts OOPSLA 2014] and [http://adapt-workshop.org/2014 ADAPT 2014]. Our eventual goal is to develop the common evaluation methodology gradually and collaboratively. See [http://artifact-eval.org artifact-eval.org] and [http://c-mind.org/reproducibility c-mind.org/reproducibility] for more details. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| − | | style="width: | + | | style="width: 35%" valign="top" | |
<span style="font-size:large">'''<span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">Artifact Evaluation Committee (AEC)</span>'''</span> | <span style="font-size:large">'''<span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">Artifact Evaluation Committee (AEC)</span>'''</span> | ||
| Line 51: | Line 71: | ||
*Santiago Bock, University of Pittsburgh, USA | *Santiago Bock, University of Pittsburgh, USA | ||
*Lingda Li, Rutgers University, USA | *Lingda Li, Rutgers University, USA | ||
| − | *Lin Ma, | + | *Lin Ma, Huawei America Research Lab, USA |
| − | * | + | *Yiannis Nikolakopulos, Chalmers University, Sweden |
*Jeeva Paudel, University of Alberta, Canada | *Jeeva Paudel, University of Alberta, Canada | ||
*Paul Thomson, Imperial College London, UK | *Paul Thomson, Imperial College London, UK | ||
| Line 65: | Line 85: | ||
*Vojtech Horky, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic | *Vojtech Horky, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic | ||
*Vasileios Trigonakis, EPFL, Switzerland | *Vasileios Trigonakis, EPFL, Switzerland | ||
| − | *Mahdi Eslamimehr, | + | *Mahdi Eslamimehr, SAP Labs, USA |
*Yuhao Zhu, University of Texas Austin, USA | *Yuhao Zhu, University of Texas Austin, USA | ||
*Melanie Kambadur, Columbia University, USA | *Melanie Kambadur, Columbia University, USA | ||
*Michael Laurenzano, UMich, USA | *Michael Laurenzano, UMich, USA | ||
| − | | style="width: | + | | style="width: 37%" valign="top" | |
<span style="font-size:large">'''<span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">Above threshold</span>'''</span> | <span style="font-size:large">'''<span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">Above threshold</span>'''</span> | ||
| − | + | List of papers with artifacts above threshold: | |
| − | + | ||
| + | *'''''NUMA-aware Graph-structured Analytics'''''<br/>Kaiyuan Zhang, Rong Chen and Haibo Chen | ||
| + | *'''''Predicate RCU: An RCU for Scalable Concurrent Updates'''''<br/>Maya Arbel and Adam Morrison | ||
| + | *'''''Scalable and Efficient Implementation of 3D Unstructured Meshes Computation: A Case Study on Matrix Assembly'''''<br/>Loïc Thébault, Eric Petit and Quang Dinh | ||
| + | *'''''VirtCL: A Framework for OpenCL Device Abstraction and Management'''''<br/>Yi-Ping You, Hen-Jung Wu, Yeh-Ning Tsai and Yen-Ting Chao | ||
| + | *'''''Dynamic deadlock verification for general barrier synchronisation'''''<br/>Tiago Cogumbreiro, Raymond Hu, Francisco Martins and Nobuko Yoshida | ||
| + | *'''''Low-Overhead Software Transactional Memory with Progress Guarantees and Strong Semantics'''''<br/>Minjia Zhang, Jipeng Huang, Man Cao and Michael Bond | ||
| + | *'''''The SprayList: A Scalable Relaxed Priority Queue'''''<br/>Justin Kopinsky, Dan Alistarh, Jerry Li and Nir Shavit | ||
| + | *'''''Performance Implications of Dynamic Memory Allocators on Transactional Memory Systems'''''<br/>Alexandro Baldassin, Edson Borin and Guido Araujo | ||
| + | *'''''More than You Ever Wanted to Know about Synchronization'''''<br/>Vincent Gramoli | ||
| + | *'''''Cache-Oblivious Wavefront: Improving Parallelism of Recursive DP Algorithms without Losing Cache-efficiency'''''<br/>Yuan Tang, Ronghui You, Haibin Kan, Jesmin Tithi, Pramod Ganapathi and Rezaul Chowdhury | ||
| + | |||
<span style="font-size:large">'''<span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">Discussions</span>'''</span> | <span style="font-size:large">'''<span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">Discussions</span>'''</span> | ||
| − | We consider AE as a continuous learning curve. If you have questions or comments and suggestions on how to improve packaging and reviewing process, please get in touch or use our public [https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/collective-mind Google] or [http://www.linkedin.com/groups/Reproducible-research-experimentation-in-computer-7433414 LinkedIn] groups. | + | We consider AE as a continuous learning curve. If you have questions or comments and suggestions on how to improve packaging and reviewing process, please get in touch or use our public [https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/collective-mind Google] or [http://www.linkedin.com/groups/Reproducible-research-experimentation-in-computer-7433414 LinkedIn] groups. We will hold a joint public CGO/PPoPP AE discussion session on February 9th, 2015. |
|} | |} | ||
| Line 85: | Line 116: | ||
<br/>'''Sponsors and supporters''' | <br/>'''Sponsors and supporters''' | ||
| − | [[File:CTuning foundation | + | [[File:NVLogo 2D resize.jpg|NVLogo 2D resize.jpg|link=http://nvidia.com]][[File:CTuning foundation logo1a.png|CTuning foundation logo1a.png|link=http://cTuning.org]] |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
Latest revision as of 19:50, 12 February 2015
 |
Artifact Evaluation for PPoPP'15 |
Prizes for 2 highest ranked artifacts
|
1st place sponsored by |
2nd place sponsored by |
|
"Nvidia Quadro K6000" for |
"Acer C720P" for |
| Important dates
Packaging guidelines We use the following guidelines for artifacts. Because we want to encourage as many of you as possible to submit, these are only guidelines, not hard rules. Of course, if the material you want us to evaluate is fairly standard, following these suggestions will greatly simplify our lives. After all, remember: You want us to be able to evaluate your artifact, don't you? How to submit Please read the guidelines on what to submit. Please upload your submission to EasyChair (common with CGO). Review process The review process is described in detail here. Prior Artifact Evaluation Artifacts have been already evaluated at several conferences and workshops including recent PLDI 2014, OOPSLA 2014 and ADAPT 2014. Our eventual goal is to develop the common evaluation methodology gradually and collaboratively. See artifact-eval.org and c-mind.org/reproducibility for more details. |
Artifact Evaluation Committee (AEC) Chairs:
Advisory board:
Committee members:
|
Above threshold List of papers with artifacts above threshold:
Discussions We consider AE as a continuous learning curve. If you have questions or comments and suggestions on how to improve packaging and reviewing process, please get in touch or use our public Google or LinkedIn groups. We will hold a joint public CGO/PPoPP AE discussion session on February 9th, 2015. |
Sponsors and supporters
