| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
*[http://retractionwatch.com/2014/09/05/white-house-takes-notice-of-reproducibility-in-science-and-wants-your-opinion White House takes notice of reproducibility in science, and wants your opinion] | *[http://retractionwatch.com/2014/09/05/white-house-takes-notice-of-reproducibility-in-science-and-wants-your-opinion White House takes notice of reproducibility in science, and wants your opinion] | ||
*Problems during performance benchmarking: | *Problems during performance benchmarking: | ||
| − | **[https://homes.cs.washington.edu/~bornholt/post/performance-evaluation.html]<br/>''We also experienced many similar issues during our work on auto-tuning and machine learning:'' | + | **[https://homes.cs.washington.edu/~bornholt/post/performance-evaluation.html [https://homes.cs.washington.edu/~bornholt/post/performance-evaluation.html]]<br/>''We also experienced many similar issues during our work on auto-tuning and machine learning:'' |
| − | **[http://hal.inria.fr/hal-01054763] | + | **[http://hal.inria.fr/hal-01054763 [http://hal.inria.fr/hal-01054763]] |
| − | **[http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.4020] | + | **[http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.4020 [http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.4020]] |
*[http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2723872 ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review - Special Issue on Repeatability and Sharing of Experimental Artifacts] | *[http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2723872 ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review - Special Issue on Repeatability and Sharing of Experimental Artifacts] | ||
| − | *[http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?reload=true&arnumber=5768098 Vinton G. Cerf. "Bit Rot: Long-Term Preservation of Digital Information" [Point of View] | + | *[http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?reload=true&arnumber=5768098 Vinton G. Cerf. "Bit Rot: Long-Term Preservation of Digital Information" [Point of View]] |
*[http://www.nature.com/news/the-top-100-papers-1.16224 About citations: less related though interesting] | *[http://www.nature.com/news/the-top-100-papers-1.16224 About citations: less related though interesting] | ||
Revision as of 17:49, 5 February 2015
Assorted articles and presentations
- Our Experience report and new proposal: community-driven reviewing and validation of publications [arXiv , ACM DL]
- Research Wranglers: Initiatives to Improve Reproducibility of Study Findings (Environmental Health Perspectives)
- Predatory publishing
- Three myths about scientific peer review
- "Begin with an Author's response to Reviews" - proposal to submit past reviews along with articles
- Presentation by Professor Carole Goble
- Dennis McCafferty, "Should Code be Released?"
- Chris Drummond, "Replicability is not Reproducibility: Nor is it Good Science"
- Science is in a reproducibility crisis - how do we resolve it?
- My blog article on "Automatic performance tuning and reproducibility as a side effect" for the Software Sustainability Institute
- Puzzling Measurement of "Big G" Gravitational Constant Ignites Debate
- White House takes notice of reproducibility in science, and wants your opinion
- Problems during performance benchmarking:
- [https://homes.cs.washington.edu/~bornholt/post/performance-evaluation.html]
We also experienced many similar issues during our work on auto-tuning and machine learning: - [http://hal.inria.fr/hal-01054763]
- [http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.4020]
- [https://homes.cs.washington.edu/~bornholt/post/performance-evaluation.html]
- ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review - Special Issue on Repeatability and Sharing of Experimental Artifacts
- Vinton G. Cerf. "Bit Rot: Long-Term Preservation of Digital Information" [Point of View]
- About citations: less related though interesting
