| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
=== '''Assorted articles and presentations'''<br/> === | === '''Assorted articles and presentations'''<br/> === | ||
| − | *Experience report and new proposal: ''community-driven reviewing and validation of publications'' [[http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.4020 arXiv] , [http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2618142 ACM DL]] | + | *Our Experience report and new proposal: ''community-driven reviewing and validation of publications'' [[http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.4020 arXiv] , [http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2618142 ACM DL]] |
*[http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/122-a188 Research Wranglers: Initiatives to Improve Reproducibility of Study Findings] (Environmental Health Perspectives) | *[http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/122-a188 Research Wranglers: Initiatives to Improve Reproducibility of Study Findings] (Environmental Health Perspectives) | ||
*[http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/32426/title/Predatory-Publishing Predatory publishing] | *[http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/32426/title/Predatory-Publishing Predatory publishing] | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*[http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1536616.1536619 "Begin with an Author's response to Reviews"] - proposal to submit past reviews along with articles | *[http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1536616.1536619 "Begin with an Author's response to Reviews"] - proposal to submit past reviews along with articles | ||
*[https://www.dropbox.com/s/67n49i9k3cb28mo/GOBLE-CW2014.ppt Presentation by Professor Carole Goble] | *[https://www.dropbox.com/s/67n49i9k3cb28mo/GOBLE-CW2014.ppt Presentation by Professor Carole Goble] | ||
| + | *Dennis McCafferty, [http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1831415 "Should Code be Released?"] | ||
| + | *Chris Drummond, [http://cogprints.org/7691/7/ICMLws09.pdf "Replicability is not Reproducibility: Nor is it Good Science"] | ||
| + | *[http://theconversation.com/science-is-in-a-reproducibility-crisis-how-do-we-resolve-it-16998 Science is in a reproducibility crisis - how do we resolve it?] | ||
| + | *My blog article on [http://www.software.ac.uk/blog/2014-07-22-automatic-performance-tuning-and-reproducibility-side-effect "Automatic performance tuning and reproducibility as a side effect"] for the Software Sustainability Institute | ||
| + | *[http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/puzzling-measurement-of-big-g-gravitational-constant-ignites-debate-slide-show/ Puzzling Measurement of "Big G" Gravitational Constant Ignites Debate] | ||
| + | *[http://retractionwatch.com/2014/09/05/white-house-takes-notice-of-reproducibility-in-science-and-wants-your-opinion White House takes notice of reproducibility in science, and wants your opinion] | ||
Revision as of 10:46, 5 February 2015
Assorted articles and presentations
- Our Experience report and new proposal: community-driven reviewing and validation of publications [arXiv , ACM DL]
- Research Wranglers: Initiatives to Improve Reproducibility of Study Findings (Environmental Health Perspectives)
- Predatory publishing
- Three myths about scientific peer review
- "Begin with an Author's response to Reviews" - proposal to submit past reviews along with articles
- Presentation by Professor Carole Goble
- Dennis McCafferty, "Should Code be Released?"
- Chris Drummond, "Replicability is not Reproducibility: Nor is it Good Science"
- Science is in a reproducibility crisis - how do we resolve it?
- My blog article on "Automatic performance tuning and reproducibility as a side effect" for the Software Sustainability Institute
- Puzzling Measurement of "Big G" Gravitational Constant Ignites Debate
- White House takes notice of reproducibility in science, and wants your opinion
