| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align: right width: 200px" | [[File:Ae-stamp-cgo.png]]<br/> | | style="text-align: right width: 200px" | [[File:Ae-stamp-cgo.png]]<br/> | ||
| − | | <p style="text-align: center"><span style="font-size: | + | | <p style="text-align: center"><span style="font-size:xx-large">'''<span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">Artifact Evaluation for CGO'15</span>'''</span></p><p style="text-align: center"><span style="font-size:small">[ [http://cgo.org/cgo2015 Back to CGO'15 conference website] ] [ [[Reproducibility|Back to reproducibility wiki]] ]</span></p> |
|} | |} | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| <div class="span4"> | | <div class="span4"> | ||
| − | == | + | <span style="font-size:large">'''<span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">Important dates</span>'''</span> |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | == | + | <span style="font-size:large">'''<span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">Packaging guidelines</span>'''</span> |
| − | + | We use the following [http://www.artifact-eval.org/guidelines.html guidelines for artifacts]. Because we want to encourage as many of you as possible to submit, these are only guidelines, not hard rules. Of course, if the material you want us to evaluate is fairly standard, following these suggestions will greatly simplify our lives. After all, remember: ''You '''want''' us to be able to evaluate your artifact, don't you?'' | |
| − | == | + | <span style="font-size:large">'''<span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">How to submit</span>'''</span> |
| + | Please read the [http://www.artifact-eval.org/guidelines.html guidelines] on ''what'' to submit. Please upload your submission to [https://easychair.org/conferences/?conf=aecgo2015 EasyChair].<br/> | ||
| + | <span style="font-size:large">'''<span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">CGO'15 AEC</span>'''</span> | ||
| − | The committee consists of several up-and-coming researchers with [http://www.cs.utah.edu/%7Eeeide/ Eric Eide], [http://www.cs.brown.edu/%7Esk/ Shriram Krishnamurthi], and [http://www.cs.purdue.edu/homes/jv/ Jan Vitek] heading the process. | + | The Artifact Evaluation committe committee consists of several up-and-coming researchers with [http://www.cs.utah.edu/%7Eeeide/ Eric Eide], [http://www.cs.brown.edu/%7Esk/ Shriram Krishnamurthi], and [http://www.cs.purdue.edu/homes/jv/ Jan Vitek] heading the process. |
See the [http://pldi14-aec.cs.brown.edu/committee/index.html committee members]! | See the [http://pldi14-aec.cs.brown.edu/committee/index.html committee members]! | ||
| − | == Prior | + | <span style="font-size:large">'''<span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">Prior Artifact Evaluation</span>'''</span> |
| + | Here's a [http://cs.brown.edu/%7Esk/Memos/Conference-Artifact-Evaluation/ report] on the AEC process for ESEC/FSE 2011. You can also see the AEC sites for [http://ecoop13-aec.cs.brown.edu/ ECOOP 2013] and [http://splashcon.org/2013/cfp/665 OOPSLA 2013].<br/></div> | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | <span style="font-size:large">'''<span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif">Process</span>'''</span> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Artifact evaluation is open ''only'' to accepted papers. This is intentional: it ensures that the AEC cannot influence whether or not a paper is accepted. This measure was put in place to reassure authors who felt this would be too radical a change to the process of evaluating conference paper submissions. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Of course, this doesn't mean you can't start getting ready! We have published the packaging guidelines, so you can begin to prepare your artifacts for submission. Even if your paper doesn't get accepted, this should still be a useful exercise for general dissemination. In addition, we hope the guidelines will give you ideas about how your material can be disseminated, either by suggesting methods you hadn't considered or pointing you to resources you weren't aware of. | ||
| + | |||
| + | As soon as papers are chosen for the conference, you will be invited to submit. We will then have a few weeks in which to perform the evaluation. We may contact you if we have a problem with the submission, but there is no formal “response” period. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Thus, even though there is nothing formally to do now, you would do well to have your artifact packaged and ready to go. The moment you receive the good news, you should be ready to upload! | ||
| + | |||
| + | | | ||
| + | == Papers with artifacts above threshold<br/> == | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|} | |} | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
Revision as of 21:09, 28 July 2014
 |
Artifact Evaluation for CGO'15 [ Back to CGO'15 conference website ] [ Back to reproducibility wiki ] |
| Important dates
Packaging guidelines We use the following guidelines for artifacts. Because we want to encourage as many of you as possible to submit, these are only guidelines, not hard rules. Of course, if the material you want us to evaluate is fairly standard, following these suggestions will greatly simplify our lives. After all, remember: You want us to be able to evaluate your artifact, don't you? How to submit
Please read the guidelines on what to submit. Please upload your submission to EasyChair. The Artifact Evaluation committe committee consists of several up-and-coming researchers with Eric Eide, Shriram Krishnamurthi, and Jan Vitek heading the process. See the committee members! Prior Artifact Evaluation Here's a report on the AEC process for ESEC/FSE 2011. You can also see the AEC sites for ECOOP 2013 and OOPSLA 2013. |
Process Artifact evaluation is open only to accepted papers. This is intentional: it ensures that the AEC cannot influence whether or not a paper is accepted. This measure was put in place to reassure authors who felt this would be too radical a change to the process of evaluating conference paper submissions. Of course, this doesn't mean you can't start getting ready! We have published the packaging guidelines, so you can begin to prepare your artifacts for submission. Even if your paper doesn't get accepted, this should still be a useful exercise for general dissemination. In addition, we hope the guidelines will give you ideas about how your material can be disseminated, either by suggesting methods you hadn't considered or pointing you to resources you weren't aware of. As soon as papers are chosen for the conference, you will be invited to submit. We will then have a few weeks in which to perform the evaluation. We may contact you if we have a problem with the submission, but there is no formal “response” period. Thus, even though there is nothing formally to do now, you would do well to have your artifact packaged and ready to go. The moment you receive the good news, you should be ready to upload! |
Papers with artifacts above threshold
|
