Difference between revisions of "Reproducibility:Articles"

Revision as of 21:02, 10 July 2014

Experience report and new proposal: community-driven reviewing and validation of publications [arXiv , ACM DL]
Predatory publishing
Three myths about scientific peer review
Why invention and innovation diverge (with a comment on reviewing by J.N.Amaral) - only for ACM DL subscribers
Presentation by Professor Carole Globe

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+[ '''''[[Reproducibility|Back to main page]]''''' ]
 [ '''''[[Reproducibility|Back to main page]]''''' ]
 === '''Assorted articles and presentations'''<br/> ===
-*Experience report and new proposal: community-driven reviewing of publications and artifacts [[http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.4020 arXiv] , [http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2618142 ACM DL]]
+*Experience report and new proposal: ''community-driven reviewing and validation of publications'' [[http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.4020 arXiv] , [http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2618142 ACM DL]]
-*[https://www.dropbox.com/s/67n49i9k3cb28mo/GOBLE-CW2014.ppt Presentation by Professor Carole Globe]
 *[http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/32426/title/Predatory-Publishing Predatory publishing]
 *[http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/three-myths-about-scientific-peer-review Three myths about scientific peer review]
 *[http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1536616.1536619&coll=portal&dl=ACM Why invention and innovation diverge] (with a comment on reviewing by J.N.Amaral) - only for ACM DL subscribers
+*[https://www.dropbox.com/s/67n49i9k3cb28mo/GOBLE-CW2014.ppt Presentation by Professor Carole Globe]