Artifact evaluation promotes reproducibility of experimental results and encourages code and data sharing. The authors will need to fill the unified Artifact Appendix to describe the minimal software, hardware and data set requirements, and explaining how to prepare, run and reproduce key experiments. The Artifact Appendix should be appended to the accepted paper and submitted for evaluation via MICRO'24 AE HotCRP website.

This Artifact Appendix was introduced to unify the description of experimental setups and results across different conferences. Though it is relatively intuitive and based on the feedback from the community, we encourage the authors to check the Artifact Appendix guide, artifact reviewing guide, the SIGPLAN Empirical Evaluation Guidelines, the NeurIPS reproducibility checklist, AE FAQs and Artifact Appendices from MICRO'23 papers before submitting artifacts for evaluation.

This submission is voluntary and will not influence the final decision regarding the papers - our goal is to help the authors validate their experiments by an independent AE Committee in a collaborative and constructive way. Furthermore, the authors can add notes and corrections to the Artifact Appendix if some mistakes were found during artifact evaluation.

The authors will communicate with evaluators via HotCRP after the submission.

We suggest the authors to make their artifacts available for evaluation via GitHub or similar public or private service. Public artifact sharing allows the authors to quickly fix encountered issues during evaluation before submitting the final version to archival repositories. Other acceptable methods include:

• Using zip or tar files with all related code and data, particularly when code must be rebuilt on reviewers' machines (for example to have a non-virtualized access to some specific hardware).
• Using Docker and similar technology.
• Arranging remote access to the authors' machine with the pre-installed software - this is an exceptional cases when rare or proprietary software and hardware is used. The authors will need to privately send the access information to the AE chairs.

The papers that successfully go through AE will receive a set of ACM badges of approval printed on the papers themselves and available as meta information in the ACM Digital Library (it is now possible to search for papers with specific badges in the ACM DL). Authors of such papers will have an option to include up to 2 pages of their Artifact Appendix to the camera-ready paper.