### Review template for Artifact Evaluation V20170622

Please, check details about scoring here: http://cTuning.org/ae/reviewing.html

Possible scores:
* +1: exceeded expectations
*  0: met expectations (or inapplicable)
* -1: fell below expectations

################################################################

# Artifacts publicly available (if applicable): (add your score)

(Describe your experience, success/failure,
encountered problems, and suggestions to authors)


# Package complete: (add your score)
(Describe your experience, success/failure,
encountered problems, and suggestions to authors)


# Well documented: (add your score)
(Describe your experience, success/failure,
encountered problems, and suggestions to authors)


# Exercisable: (add your score)
(Describe your experience, success/failure,
encountered problems, and suggestions to authors)


# Consistent: (add your score)
(Describe your experience, success/failure,
encountered problems, and suggestions to authors)


# Artifacts functional: (add your overall score)
(Describe your experience, success/failure,
encountered problems, and suggestions to authors)


# Artifacts customizable and reusable: (add your score)
(Describe your experience, success/failure,
encountered problems, and suggestions to authors)


# Results replicated (if applicable): (add your score)
(Describe your experience, success/failure,
encountered problems, and suggestions to authors)


# Results reproduced (if applicable): (add your score)
(Describe your experience, success/failure,
encountered problems, and suggestions to authors)


################################################################

# Overall score: (add your score)

Did artifacts and results match authors' description? 

Provide explanation of your score and 
what can be improved during rebuttal.